Realist Approach of US-Canadian Relations (Background)

Above: Current Canadian Prime Minister, Stephen Harper,

photographed with U.S. President, Barack Obama.

Prior to World War I, the international relationship between the U.S. and Canada was more ‘realist’ in the sense that the states acted with dual morality; the two actors were focused on their domestic affairs, independent from their international affairs. The states functioned as their own territories, linked by the geographical location and economic exchanges. The war plans between the two countries at the time exemplify the strange relationship the North American countries had created. The U.S. had obtained a map of Canadian territory from their own government, allowing the U.S. to make plans for invasion.  Canada had plans to capture Seattle and Minneapolis, while the U.S. was ready to add Canadian territory to the Union in event of inter-state war.  The actions seemed to be more precautionary than threatening; the U.S. was concerned with British control in Canadian territory. Canada, on the other hand, wanted to be seen as a more independent state. (Note: At this time, Canada was still not 100% its own state.  British Parliament held the power to amend the Canadian Constitution. See “Canada, Eh?” post.)

To be continued,

Day 52: Four people who tried to sue over the English language

French-Canadian Couple dislikes English (language)

A new day, a new thing

As English continues to grow in popularity around the world, it is somewhat understandable that people might feel the language is creeping into their lives a little too much. While reading about ‘language facts’ on the Edudemic site today, I found a snippet of information about a Japanese man who tried to sue the national broadcaster NHK because of the amount of loan words from English being used by the station. Today’s post is all about people who have tried to sue over an issue related to the English language.

Man tries to sue NHK over emotional stress caused by English loanwords

250px-NHK_logo.svg

I’ll start with the story that turned me on to today’s post. The story is from 2013, and involves Hoji Takahashi, a 71-year-old man (at the time) from the Chebu region of Japan. Mr Takahashi complained that Japan was becoming too Americanised and was not happy with the…

View original post 569 more words

Canada Eh?

O’ Canada – A Brief History

An Old Colony

The “pre-history” of Canada is only recorded by oral means of the native peoples – written history was not of creation prior to the late 15th century.

The explorers of the late 15th century had found settled peoples along the coast of the early Americas; natives were relocated to reservations by European explorers to make room for a New World.

Soon after, “New France” would be established in present-day Canadian lands as a result of the fast growing trend of colonialism in Europe. New France includes cities like Quebec City and Montreal; today, Canada’s two official languages are English and French. During these times, the French and English fought to establish colonies in the New World. A passage of time would prove that the French were more successful in the north – Canada – and the English in the south – US of America.

At the turn of the 18th century, focus on Canadian lands increased further.  With the American Revolution in the south, the British still pursued attempts to claim land in Canada of the north.  As a result, the settled French moved west to avoid conflict with the English.

During the 19th century, there was a common desire for change amongst colonial settlers. A “Responsible Government” was created in an attempt to control the French and English under one governmental body – to unite Canada.

On 1 July 1867, the Canadas were united peacefully while maintaining good relations with the mother country. Ottawa was declared the new capital and is known as the original site for the new country.  Bells rang across the lands; new Parliament buildings were in the makings; a Prime Minister was Knighted.  Over 3 million peoples were born to a new country.

The Canada Act of 1982, signed on 17 April, officially marks Canada’s entitlement as a independent nation.  The Act allows the country to amend its own Constitution, which was previously only done by the British Parliament.  Canada Day, celebrated on 1 July, is a day of nation celebration; the holiday was only recently renamed with the Canada Act of 1982.  The holiday was previously called “Dominion Day” but still celebrates the accounts of 1 July 1867 – when the northern American colonies united formally as “Canada” under the British Empire.

Fun Facts:

  • In Canada, syrups must be at least 66 percent sugar be exclusively made from maple sap to qualify as maple syrup.
  • Drake (rapper) is the “global ambassador for the Toronto Raptors (NBA team).
  • The Canadian one dollar coin is recognized as a “loonie” by the Royal Canadian Mint as of 2006.  The name originates from the loon – a common bird of Canada – depicted on the coin.

(Fact 1, 2, 3 – Thanks Wikipedia)

Political Blog Topic

KXL Pipeline

NOTE: The author of this blog currently holds no stance on the potential construction of the Keystone Export Pipeline

A hot button issue in the legislative branch is the Keystone XL Pipeline.  The KXL Pipeline is a potential oil pipeline from Alberta, Canada to central U.S. states – like Nebraska, Missouri and Illinois.  “The pipeline will allow Canadian and American oil producers more access to the large refining markets found in the American Midwest and along the U.S. Gulf Coast,” according to the TransCanada site.

According to the KXL Pipeline site, the TransCanada company is more than just a pipeline company.  The company also has donework with hyrdro, wind, solar, and nuclear power. The map below shows a variety of TransCanada projects across Canada, the U.S., and Mexico.

Keystone XL Pipeline Graphic: TransCanada Asset Map.

More often heard are the negative impacts that the KXL Pipeline may/will have.

In our own neck of the woods, Allegheny College students have been traveling to Washington D.C. in the past years to protest the construction of the Pipeline. There is a primary source, dated November 2011, that can be found on the College’s website under  “Gator Blogs.”

Students of Environmental Action, or SEA, also ventured to Washington D.C. to protest the Pipeline in the September 2014. The club and its members is a direct resource to the cons of the Keystone XL Pipeline. **Most if not all of its members are publically known to be against the creation of the Pipeline. 350.org, a grassroots global network for climate movement states, “[The tar sands oil carried by the KXL Pipeline] has a massive carbon footprint — sometimes requiring more energy to produce than it creates — and the fossil fuel industry needs KXL to make extraction economically feasible”(Personal e-mail).

A Nebraska native present at the November 2011 protest states, “We got great water resources in the state… all the rivers run west to east, this pipeline… will cut across every single one of them and contaminate every single watershed in the state”(The Huffington Post).

When a Huffington Post journalist asked about the new job potential in this bad economy, protesters had many things to say:

MA native – “That’s just hype… that’s just a big lie.”

NY native – “Should we be, in order to get jobs, making the world a less loving place – a miserable place?”

Iraq War Veteran – “You have to look at the long term costs as opposed to the short term costs. We need to retool the whole economy to green energy. …If you just look at the short term you’ll never get free of the larger problems, you can never see the bigger picture.”

**An official statement on the KXL Pipeline by the President of SEA is eagerly awaited.